Why Substance Abuse Experts Say Vaping Should Be Supported as a Smoking Cessation Tool in 2026
Estimated 0 min read
Smoking still causes millions of preventable deaths globally, and quitting remains one of the hardest challenges for long-time smokers. In recent years, views on vaping have shifted considerably in scientific, regulatory, and public health circles. Today, more substance abuse experts argue that vaping deserves serious consideration as a tool for helping smokers quit.
One of the most prominent voices in this debate is Dr. Neil McKeganey, Director of the Center for Substance Use Research, who recently made his stance clear in an opinion piece. He argues that vaping should be supported as a smoking cessation method, not vilified, and that regulatory approaches should reflect the science emerging in 2026.
Before we dig into why experts like McKeganey have changed their tune, let’s look at how vaping’s risk profile compares to smoking and why this matters.
Table of Contents
- How Vaping Compares to Smoking
- Why Experts Are Rethinking Vaping
- Understanding the Pushback: Conflicting Evidence on Youth Vaping
- How Vape Flavors Fit Into Quitting and Retail Trends
- Steps Experts Recommend for Policy and Regulation
- Questions for Reflection
- Final Thoughts: The Role of Vaping in 2026 Smoking Cessation
How Vaping Compares to Smoking
Scientific research continues to show that e-cigarettes are far less harmful than combustible cigarettes. Smokers inhale thousands of toxic chemicals from burning tobacco. In contrast, vaping involves inhaling an aerosol created by heating e-liquid. While not risk-free, the consensus in multiple health studies is that vaping exposes users to significantly fewer toxicants.
Recent large-scale surveys, including the U.S. Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) and National Health Interview Study (NHIS), reveal:
-
Smokers who switch to vaping report fewer respiratory symptoms
-
Daily vapers are more likely to make serious quit attempts
-
Many who quit smoking with vaping attribute their success to flavored e-liquids
These findings help explain why experts now view vaping not just as an alternative, but as a practical cessation tool.
Why Experts Are Rethinking Vaping
1. Evolving Federal Policy Framework
According to an article from Bloomberg, the FDA’s newly formed Nicotine Steering Committee reflects a shift in regulatory thinking. This committee is tasked with modernizing how the Food and Drug Administration treats e-cigarettes and vaping products, acknowledging that nicotine without smoke carries far lower health risk.
This kind of regulatory evolution matters for vape retailers and manufacturers because it signals long-term legitimacy for compliant vaping products.
2. Evidence on Flavors and Quitting Success
McKeganey and several other researchers point to data showing that flavored vape juice is linked to higher quit success among adults. While restrictive policies have targeted flavors in an effort to reduce youth uptake, data increasingly suggests that adult smokers benefit from having flavor choices when switching.
Example: survey participants often report starting with tobacco flavors and transitioning to fruit or menthol profiles as they distance themselves from smoking habits.
3. Public Health Impact of Harm Reduction
Public health bodies in the UK and parts of Europe have adopted harm reduction frameworks that explicitly endorse vaping for smoking cessation. In Scotland and England, for example, vape-assisted quit attempts are part of official smoking cessation programs and are associated with measurable reductions in smoking prevalence.
This global context is influencing U.S. experts and policymakers to rethink harm reduction strategies, especially in light of declining youth vaping rates and increasing adult quit success.
Understanding the Pushback: Conflicting Evidence on Youth Vaping
One of the central concerns opponents raise is the potential for vaping to act as a “gateway” to smoking among young people. Some studies, such as those referenced by the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy, suggest teens who vape may be more likely to try smoking later.
However, experts caution that correlation does not prove causation. Many teens who vape today previously experimented with cigarettes. When studies control for prior smoking behavior, the gateway effect becomes much less clear.
Additionally, data from 2025 and 2026 show:
-
Youth smoking rates continue to decline alongside vaping
-
Most teen vapers do not progress to regular cigarette use
-
Targeted enforcement of age restrictions has reduced underage sales
The result is a nuanced public health landscape where vaping is no longer a simple risk or menace, but part of a broader conversation about nicotine use patterns.
How Vape Flavors Fit Into Quitting and Retail Trends
Flavor restrictions have been a hot-button issue. Critics argue that flavored vape juice attracts non-smokers and minors. Proponents counter that flavors help adult smokers switch successfully.
Here’s why flavors matter:
-
Behavioral transition: Many recent quitters report starting with tobacco flavors and moving to other profiles as they quit smoking
-
Enjoyment factor: Pleasurable flavors can make the switch from smoking feel less punitive
-
Retail differentiation: Offering a range of vape flavors helps adult customers find a satisfying alternative to cigarettes
For retailers, stocking a thoughtful selection of FDA-compliant flavors can serve both adult customers and business goals.
Steps Experts Recommend for Policy and Regulation
Experts like McKeganey suggest a balanced approach to vaping regulation:
Prioritize FDA Authorization
Compliant products with verified safety profiles should remain available to adult smokers.
Protect Youth Without Banning Adult Access
Strict age verification, anti-loitering enforcement, and retailer compliance programs can limit youth access without eliminating adult choices.
Allow Flavor Variety for Quit Support
Rather than broad flavor bans, targeted restrictions on youth-focused marketing may be more effective.
Educate Rather Than Prohibit
Public health messaging that accurately reflects relative risk can empower smokers to make informed cessation choices.
This approach recognizes that harm reduction matters. Smokers who switch to vaping dramatically reduce their exposure to cancer-causing combustion products, even if some risk remains.
Questions for Reflection
Take a moment to consider how these trends might impact your business:
-
Do you believe vaping should be marketed as a smoking cessation tool?
-
Have you seen customers successfully quit smoking with vaping?
-
Should vape retailers emphasize FDA-compliant devices and flavors in their product mix?
Comment below with your perspective.
Final Thoughts: The Role of Vaping in 2026 Smoking Cessation
In 2026, the conversation around vaping has evolved. What once was a strictly controversial product category is increasingly seen through the lens of harm reduction. Substance abuse experts, emerging research, and international tobacco control frameworks are converging on the idea that vaping can play a meaningful role in helping smokers quit.
For vape retailers, wholesalers, and brands, understanding this shift is critical. A growing body of evidence supports the idea that regulated, adult-focused vaping products can be effective smoking cessation tools. Aligning product offerings with this trend can create both public health value and commercial opportunity.
As policy catches up with science, the future of vaping may not be about restricting access, but about encouraging the right products to the right people at the right time.
